Do I have to stop when a police officer asks?

There is a difference between detaining someone using the authority of law and merely asking questions. Any police officer may ask any free person questions in a voluntary manner. That is called a consensual encounter. Your rights during a consensual encounter are generally to decline to answer questions and/or walk away if you wish. If you have not been detained by some objective use of an officer’s authority (official commands, use of force, physical seizure, etc.), you are likely free to leave. However, if an officer’s questions are accompanied by obligatory commands, threats of force, arrest, or other types of seizure, such that a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, the encounter generally turns into a detention and/or arrest.
a police stop
A police officer must have reasonable suspicion to detain for a limited timeframe during a Terry stop/detention and must have probable cause to make an arrest. That is why the ACLU and other know your rights groups teach that when you are in an encounter with an officer, you should always inquire – am I under arrest? Am I being detained? Am I free to leave? If the officer answers yes to the first two questions or no to the third, you know the officer must possess articulable facts that would be sufficient for the type of seizure he/she has placed you in.
In all circumstances that a police officer uses their official authority to detain/arrest you, you should comply with commands and later let your lawyer argue whether the officer had sufficient information to establish the proof necessary for the type of seizure at issue.

Is it discrimination? A few questions you need to ask

Is It Discrimination? A Few Questions You Need To Ask

What qualifies as discrimination?

Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines discrimination as,

  • prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment, racial discrimination
  • the act, practice, or an instance of discriminating categorically rather than individually

It can also mean the act of distinguishing or differentiating.  But in the area of civil rights, discrimination isn’t always cut and dried.

At-will employment and discrimination

Colorado is one of the many states that have employment-at-will. This means that you or your employer can implement or terminate your employment at any time. Two weeks’ notice is a business practice, not the law, and you can be terminated on a moment’s notice, without notice. The company doesn’t need a reason, nor do they have to let you know in advance (although many companies do give advance notices of layoffs.)

You also don’t need a reason to quit, nor let your employer know in advance that you are terminating your employment. However, giving inadequate notice may affect your application for unemployment benefits. (Even if you are discharged for a different reason like medical conditions, harassment in the workplace, and hazardous working conditions, you can still apply for unemployment.)

Workplace discrimination

If you ask most people, they’ll probably tell you that discrimination doesn’t really exist anymore because of the legal protections in place. Unfortunately, that’s not actually true. Discrimination is a little harder to prove, but it does still exist in various forms.

The US has a number of laws against workplace discrimination:

Other forms of discrimination may be based on religion or sexual orientation, harassment, (sexual and non-sexual), and retaliation. Individuals in these groups are known as “protected classes,” and may be the focus of discrimination.

It may be unfair — but is it discrimination?

Discrimination can manifest in two ways:

  • Direct—being treated less favorably than the person next to you
  • Indirect—imposing a condition that you are unable to comply with

For instance: early retirement may be offered to employees who have been with the company for many years and are eligible for retirement. But in many cases, mandatory retirement may amount to age discrimination.

Another instance is a company adding a requirement to a job function knowing that some individuals could not meet the requirement.

Determining discrimination

Here are some questions to consider whether you are being discriminated against:

  • Are you, or others like you, being singled out?
  • Are you a member of a protected class, but experiencing unfair treatment or termination/layoffs? (I.e., workers over 50 being laid off and replaced by much younger employees.)
  • Are others in a protected class (LGBT, Latino women) being singled out as well?
  • Is there a pattern of bias or discrimination against a particular class, such as minorities or women, consistently being passed over for promotions or job transfers?
  • Are complaints of harassment or other adverse working conditions being ignored?
  • Has your workload or work schedule changed, but no one else’s has?
  • Have you or others recently reported wrongdoing, but are now being retaliated against? (Fewer work hours, demotion, pay cut, etc.)
  • Have you consistently done a good job, but are now receiving disciplinary notices?

These are just some of the ways you may be able to determine if there is discrimination and not a complete list of questions to ask.

Document all evidence

Most employers will deny any and all accusations of discrimination, even if it’s blatantly obvious. You’ll need some tools in your arsenal to fight back.

If you believe you’re being targeted for discrimination, your best defense is to document as much as you can. Direct evidence is best, but you may only have circumstantial evidence.

  • Performance reviews — you probably won’t be told outright that you are being terminated for an illegal reason. Instead, the official reason may be poor performance, company policy violations, or something similar. If your company does regular performance reviews (some do yearly, some do quarterly, etc.) get and keep copies where they will always be available. Paper copies kept at home are good, but an electronic copy in your Drive, Dropbox, or other cloud storage as a backup is even better.
  • Your job description — do you have a copy? Get one, and keep it on file, both paper and electronic, along with your performance reviews. Should your company suddenly terminate you for “performance issues,” you’ll be able to show what you were doing, and how it was satisfactory if you were passed over for promotion or terminated in favor of someone less qualified.
    • Employment contract — if your company uses them, get a copy if you don’t have one. As your HR department.
  • Keep any relevant communications — save memos, texts, emails, phone messages, or anything else that can show bias may be used against you.
  • Timing of termination, demotion or other adverse event — if you informed your employer of your medical condition, (i.e., pregnancy) and were abruptly terminated shortly thereafter, this may prove discrimination.
    • Medical records — if you have a disability and/or medical condition, these can be added into evidence to back up your claim that you may have been illegally terminated for medical reasons.
    • Medical treatment — if you’ve sought out mental health assistance as a result of harassment or other adverse work conditions, your attorney will also need to be informed. You’ll be asked to provide contact information of doctors, counselors, etc.
  • Termination documents — should your employer give you a suspicious reason for termination (i.e., chronic tardiness), request express written proof of their claim. If you had not committed this violation of company policy, you will have evidence that shows it was not the actual reason for your termination. Get copies of any documentation related to your termination.
  • Testimonies — both your own personal testimony and that of witnesses can be very strong corroborating evidence to prove your case. This helps avoid the “he said, she said” type of case.

Whatever you have to give to your attorney will go a long way in helping him or her defend you in a discrimination complaint.

Workplace discrimination is against the law

There are strict laws in the U.S. against discrimination. If you believe you’ve been the target of workplace discrimination, call the Civil Rights Litigation Group in Denver at (720) 515-6165 for a free consultation. We’re experienced in helping people like you fight back. We can help you file your EEOC complaint, and represent you in court when the time comes.

Wrongful arrest? Here’s what you need to prove

A wrongful arrest (also called “false arrest”) can happen to anyone at any time. You may look like someone the police are looking for, you may have been misidentified by someone (intentionally or unintentionally) or just may be in the wrong place at the wrong time. An arrest can be embarrassing, particularly if you’re not guilty. But if it happens, here’s what you need to prove you that should not have been arrested.

Wrongful Arrest? Here’s What You Need To Prove

Wrongful arrest is a violation of your Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizures. Both private citizens and law enforcement personnel can commit a wrongful arrest. You can also sue for damages by way of a civil lawsuit.

First: don’t resist an arrest

Even if you know you’re being wrongfully arrested, resisting arrest is also a crime. It may be legal to resist a wrongful arrest, but you can still be charged. You’ll still have the right to speak to an attorney, and the right to a fair trial to prove your innocence. Always be polite, and never threaten a law enforcement officer or another individual during the arrest process.

Your right to remain silent

Exercise this right, especially in the case of a wrongful arrest. Make sure you ask for and have an attorney available whenever you speak to the police. Don’t wait for them to read you the “Miranda Warning,” since anything you say at the time of arrest can also be used against you. Give no statements until you can speak to an attorney.

Decline any searches without warrants

Police have procedures they must follow when they obtain a search warrant. But if you permit a search without a warrant, your rights may not be respected. The Fourth Amendment protects you from unwarranted searches.

The “Citizen Arrest”

Private citizens can also commit a wrongful arrest by detaining you and not allowing you to leave, violating your Fourth Amendment rights. An example is a private security guard in a retail store detaining you for shoplifting without witnesses or other probable cause. If there is cause, a guard can detail you temporarily until the police arrive to take over. But detaining someone without cause becomes a wrongful arrest or false imprisonment.

The ACLU offers this guide to knowing and understanding your rights when dealing with law enforcement in the state of Colorado.

Proving wrongful arrest in court

You’ll need to make four points in your case:

  • The individual in question intentionally confined or arrested you, preventing you from leaving and depriving you of your Fourth Amendment rights. This may be law enforcement or a private individual, such as a store manager or supervisor.
  • That the plaintiff (you) was conscious of the confinement and understood that you were being confined, arrested and prevented from leaving.
  • That the plaintiff (you) did not consent to being confined, and the arrest/confinement was done anyway.
  • If the arrest was “privileged” or legally justified. This is usually when a warrant, court order, or probable cause is involved and can justify an otherwise wrongful arrest. While a warrant and a court order can make an arrest justified, probable cause is less clear and can prove that an arrest was, indeed, wrongful.

Probable Cause allows a police officer to make an arrest on someone if he or she has sufficient reason to believe at the time of the arrest that the individual has or intends to commit a crime. It does not matter if the individual is guilty of a crime — that’s addressed in court. Should an individual claim probable cause, they can use it as a defense for wrongful arrest.

 Call us — we’ll fight for your rights

Wrongful arrests can happen to anyone, anytime. If you’ve been wrongfully arrested, or your civil rights have otherwise been violated, an experienced civil rights attorney will fight for your rights. Call the Civil Rights Litigation Group at (720) 515-6165. Schedule your free consultation with us today. We’ll defend you against wrongful arrests and other overreaching actions by police, and help you clear your name.

Do I have a case for wrongful arrest?

Situation #1:

A police officer has just taken you into custody. You haven’t done anything wrong, but he or she is reading your Miranda rights to you while putting you in handcuffs. Has the officer explained the charges? Do they have probable cause for arrest or is it wrongful arrest? What evidence do they have to hold you?

Situation #2:

Are you the victim of a wrongful arrest?You’re in a shop, or somewhere out in public, and suddenly you’re not free to leave. Someone shouts, “citizens’ arrest!” Maybe there is more than one individual restricting you from leaving. You’ve done nothing wrong, but now you’ve found yourself in an arrest situation, and the police are on their way.

This scenario is typically seen in retail shops where an owner or employee believes that someone has been shoplifting. A citizen can only hold an individual until the police arrive, or to give them an opportunity to recover stolen merchandise from a suspected thief. But again, you know you’ve done nothing wrong and haven’t stolen anything.

What is a wrongful arrest?

Wrongful arrest, also called false arrest, means unlawfully confining an individual against their will by someone who does not have legal authority to do so. If there is no legal cause to hold an individual, such as a warrant for their arrest, suspicion or probable cause, the arrest can be called wrongful if they are not free to leave. While this isn’t hard-and-fast law, it covers a broad range of improper confinements.

Wrongful arrest or false arrest is an intentional tort, and is a civil rights violation. That is, the individual committing the arrest willfully intended to deprive someone of their Fourth Amendment rights, which protects you from illegal searches and seizures. While the police do make mistakes, it may be up to you as the defendant to prove that you were wronged and clear your name in court.

What next?

Wrongful arrests happen, even under the best of conditions, and will catch you unaware. Don’t let it ruin your life. What you do next can determine the final outcome, good or bad. In this situation, you should:

  1. Don’t resist the arrest, particularly one involving a police officer. Resisting an unlawful or wrongful arrest isn’t a good idea, even though it is legal in some places. You can still be charged with resisting arrest, even if you can prove later that the original arrest was unlawful.
  2. Find a civil rights attorney. Now. The sooner you get legal representation, the faster you can clear your name. He or she can help you avoid mistakes made under difficult, confusing conditions.
  3. Exercise your right to remain silent. An attorney should be present anytime you speak to authorities. He or she will ensure that you have proper representation, treated fairly, your rights are respected, and guide you through the process.
  4. Politely decline any searches that don’t come with a warrant. The police are required to follow a set of rules with a warranted search, but without one, there may not be rules.
  5. Keep track of all correspondence and conversations. Phone calls, emails, letters and other interactions may lead to evidence that proves your innocence.
  6. Pursue legal action for compensation. Your attorney can advise you on filing a civil rights lawsuit to compensate you for physical pain, mental anguish and embarrassment.

A civil rights attorney can help

A wrongful arrest brands you a criminal, and has far-reaching effects that can damage your good name. An experienced civil rights attorney can examine the facts of your case, determine if you have one, and advise you on the next steps. He or she can determine if you have a good case for wrongful arrest, and what it will take to bring disciplinary action, if the police are involved, or a civil rights lawsuit against individuals.

If you believe you’ve been wrongfully arrested, or that your civil rights have been violated, call the Civil Rights Litigation Group at (720) 515-6165. Schedule your free consultation with us today. We’ll help you fight back and help you clear your name.

Is using a TASER considered excessive force?

Using A TASER

TASER is the brand name of a CEW (conducted electrical weapon) frequently used by law enforcement officers. They were adopted by law enforcement as a non-lethal way to stop suspects who might otherwise have been shot with a firearm. Police often use a TASER to stop a suspect who is not an immediate danger to them or to public safety, or to stop someone who may cause harm to themselves. However, using a TASER can be both a good and bad solution as an alternative to firing a weapon. Worldwide, the TASER is used by over 15,000 law enforcement agencies in 40 countries. Although the TASER is considered to be a non-lethal weapon, it is somewhat controversial. Deaths have also been associated with their use.

What is excessive force?

Excessive force, a violation under the Fourth Amendment, means that a law enforcement officer used physical force beyond what was necessary at the time to stop an immediate threat, or to subdue and/or arrest an individual. The excessive force could have potentially caused serious injury. Laws governing the use of excessive force vary from state to state, and there is no federal definition of excessive force. The court and the jury have to examine all evidence and claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 to decide if a police officer was justified in using excessive force. An excessive force case against the police would be a civil suit, not criminal, and is known as a Section 1983 suit.

Justification for using a TASER

Police have to make a split-second decision on which weapon to draw, and pulling out a TASER is at the officer’s discretion. They’re usually used if the officer needs to stop someone, but deadly force isn’t warranted. If you want to pursue a case against the police, you’ll need an experienced civil rights lawyer who can help explain your options.

Courts consider excessive force cases with a TASER using:

• Severity of the crime that the individual is being arrested for
• If the individual is a threat to the officers or to the general public
• If the individual attempts escape or resists arrest

When is using a TASER considered excessive force?

TASERS are frequently used when an individual is resisting arrest, or the police officers believe there is an immediate and severe threat from the individual. However, someone who did not pose a serious threat when arrested and was found to receive excessive force can also sue the police officer, police department and municipalities for their injuries. If you were subjected to physical force that could have caused your injuries, such as the use of a TASER, contact a civil rights attorney immediately to examine your case.

In the case of Powell v. Haddock, 366 Fed.Appx. 29 (11th Cir. 2010), the police were found to have used excessive force which included using a TASER. The individual complied with the officer’s instructions, was not a threat to the officers or to public safety, backed away from the officer before the first application of the TASER and was on the ground for the second.

In deciding excessive force cases, courts also take into consideration:

• The extent of injuries
• If officers identified themselves as police
• If the officers informed the accused that they would use a TASER if he or she did not comply with instructions

Qualified immunity

Courts tend to uphold the use of a TASER when an individual is actively resisting, or if an individual was posing an immediate threat or safety risk, called qualified immunity. Police officers are given a wide range of protection when it comes to the use of force. Excessive force cases are not always cut and dried—there may be extenuating circumstances which warrant the use of a TASER. However, courts generally don’t sanction officers who use a TASER on someone who is unconscious, already subdued and/or handcuffed and wasn’t resisting.

Excessive force by a police officer is a civil rights violation

Where do you start? Evidence is vital to proving a case of excessive force. Our attorneys specialize in civil rights cases. We’ll review and start your case to defend your rights. If you’ve been the victim of police abuse with a TASER, contact the Civil Rights Litigation Group at (720) 515-6165 in Denver today for a free consultation.

For a free, no-obligation consultation with our Denver law firm, call us today at (720) 515-6165.

Call Us

720-515-6165

Fax: 720-465-1975

Contact Us

Address

Civil Rights Litigation Group

1543 Champa St., Suite #400

Denver, CO 80202